Abortion is a religious exercise pursuant of the First Amendment

Important information about the legal status of abortions and abortion law.

Biblical abortions.

Abortion is a religious exercise pursuant of the First Amendment. In Numbers 5:21-22 women consumed a drink to terminate a pregnancy. The drink caused a woman’s thigh to rot, thereby causing an abortion/miscarriage. By dating the book of Numbers (1445-1405 BC est.) we can clearly see that abortions have been a religious exercise for 3,469 years. Other historical evidence shows religious abortions practiced for a period of 5,179 years since the time of Lamech (before the flood of Noah).

According to religious law (Fourth Amendment; privacy).

The fetus is considered as a woman’s thigh [that is, as part of its mother’s body].
A fetus is not an independent being; it’s a part of the body of the person carrying it. The Bible specifically tells us that a ‘person’ is merely a husk of genetic material until it breathes life (air) to receive a soul. Why make the point? Because a right is a possession, and a right is only retained by a person for as long as it does not interfere with the rights of others outside of its jurisdiction (authority/home). The living soul has rights, the husk does not. The husk is not only nourished by its host and is conjoined thereunto; but it’s not an independent entity or an individual life form [even with a heartbeat] until it is separated, breathes air, receives a soul (from the breath of life/Spirit of God), and/or moves out of the house (biblical parental jurisdiction). See human-animal hybrids (embryos).
Abortions are permitted to save the mother’s life.
Abortions are permitted to relieve the impregnated mother from “great emotional pain.”
Abortions are permitted in situations where carrying the fetus to term would cause "woe" and "great pain."

Source: “The Jewish Torah of Reproductive Justice”.

An unborn fetus in Jewish law is not considered a person (Heb. nefesh, lit. “soul”) until it has been born. (breathes air and becomes a soul; Genesis 2:7)

Source: “The Fetus in Jewish Law”.

Abortion according to Scripture.

‘Prolife’ is not a Christian ideology. The first reported abortions were performed in the Bible. Therefore, abortions are a religious exercise pursuant of the First Amendment. The first scripture detailing abortion as a religious practice is found in the book of Numbers. In Numbers 5:15-28 (KJV), it was shown that God did not wish, want, or desire a woman to bear an illegitimate child by a man who was not her husband. Likewise, the same applies to a teenage girl bearing the child of a boyfriend who is not her husband, a woman bearing a child by rape or incest (defiled), and/or any person bearing an illegitimate child they’re not prepared to raise. The issue of abortion has remained unchanged in both testaments of the Bible. In the “Tales and Maxims from the Midrash”, by Rev. Samuel Rapaport 1907, chapter Genesis Rabba; it’s written that “In the early time of creation, in the time of Lemech (3156 B.C.), a medicine was known, the taking of which prevented a woman's conception.--Gen. Rabba 23. [additional content omitted]

About the important PDF attached.

This informative website was specifically written for legal, lawful, and constitutional purposes. Unlike other abortion rights claims, lawsuits, and/or webpages; this content is not based on supposition or speculation, but on a long-standing religious practice existing for more than 5,179 years. This extensive time frame exceeds the lawful term required for common law practices. The United States is a common law country whereas published judicial opinions outweigh codified statutes in both civil and criminal law. Many common and criminal laws overlap; however, common law concerns are enacted by legal precedents/previous court rulings. It should be noted that the legal precedent pertaining abortion is not a murky as Justic Alito’s 98-page opinion suggests. Yes, abortions were legal, then legally restricted for safety, then illegal in certain states at different stages and/or times of pregnancy. This inconsistency is telling and opinionated. In furtherance, pro-life abortion arguments, policy, and laws are factually tantamount to moral and/or religious convictions. Hence anti-abortion statutes are arbitrary and capricious. Without legal standing. Negates due process and is criminally negligent and criminally liable for its firm stance contribution to extreme emotional duress. Legally, the abortion laws in some states may even qualify as human rights violations and/or crimes against humanity due to overzealous lawmakers. The anti-abortion statutes may even constitute the establishment of a state-church if SCOTUS was actually stacked with conservative justices in favor of the Dobb’s decision (anti-abortions). The state-church forces a religious and/or moral practice on others and/or nonreligious persons in violation of Free Exercise and Establishment. In furtherance, where is the governments compelling interest in such personal matters? The attached document addresses these issues.

According to certain law schools and legal experts, abortions are impossible to define due to its legal and logical inconsistencies. Its neither murder, manslaughter, nor depraved indifference. Blacks Law Dictionary defines murder as a crime committed where a person of sound mind and discretion (that is, of sufficient age to form and execute a criminal design and not legally “insane”) kills any human creature in being (excluding quick but unborn children) and in the peace of the state or nation (including all persons except the military forces of the public enemy in time of war or battle) without any warrant, justification, or excuse in law, with malice aforethought, express or implied, that is, with a deliberate purpose or a design or determination distinctly formed in the mind before the commission of the act, provided that death results from the injury Inflicted within one year and a day after its infliction. For the distinction between murder and manslaughter and other forms of homicide, see HOMICIDE; MANSLAUGHTER. Common-law definitions. The willful killing of any subject whatever, with malice aforethought. The Department of Justice (DOJ); 1536. MURDER -- Section 1751(a) of Title 18 incorporates by reference 18 U.S.C. §§ 1111 and 1112. 18 U.S.C. § 1111 defines murder as the unlawful killing of a human being with malice, and divides it into two degrees. Murder in the first degree is punishable by death. In any case in which the death penalty may be applicable, it is necessary for the United States Attorney to follow the procedures set forth in JM 9-10.000. The Attorney General must authorize the United States Attorney to seek the death penalty in any case. Any other kind of murder is murder in the second degree and is punishable by any term of imprisonment including life.
Some state penalties for abortion and lawful procedures performed in other states are stiff. For example, Full Faith and Credit is the recognition and enforcement of the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of one state by another. Sections 1 & 2 of Article IV, of the US Constitution gives full faith and credit to the state’s power to lay laws (public acts), and judicial proceedings for as long as these activities do not interfere with and/or in any way violate the Privileges and Immunities of federal and state citizenry. At one time SCOTUS policed state court proceedings by limiting the application of local state laws over another state’s laws. This precedent draws much needed attention to the state of Idaho. The state of Idaho has made it illegal for others to help a pregnant minor abort through medication or procedures in the state of Idaho and/or in any other state; punishable by two to five years in prison. In short, Idaho has implemented laws restricting travel for abortions and/or to prosecute abortion providers of another state for helping its own residents/citizens abort [House Bill No. 242 (2023)]. Additionally, the states of Arkansas, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and Georgia intend to violate the private medical records of federal citizens residing in their local states for legal out of state abortions. This is a blatant violation of Privacy, Probable Cause, and Illegal Search and Seizures pursuant of the Fourth Amendment. According to afore mentioned abortion statutes, prohibitions only fall under the jurisdiction of the named states. Jurisdiction is at issue. If an alleged crime/abortion was performed in the jurisdiction of another state where abortions are legal then probable cause doesn’t exist. The overreach is clearly a violation of privacy and illegal search and seizure. Again, all of these overreaches are procedural due process law imposed against federal citizenry and substantial due process.

The attached document not only criticizes Justice Alito’s 98-page opinion (Dobb’s decision), but it also dismantles Justice Frankfurter’s opinion responsible for Title 42 U.S.C § 1983. Title 42 U.S.C § 1983 is a federal code and/or roadblock designed to prohibit redress in civil rights cases (this is why attorneys discourage civil rights suits). In other words, Title 42 U.S.C § 1983 is an inferior law/a procedural due process law prohibiting superior rights/substantive due process laws pursuant of the Supremacy Clause. The attached document will show attorneys how to defeat Title 42 U.S.C § 1983 in defense of their clients’ rights. The Supremacy Clause guarantees a redress of grievances for all first Amendment violations, therefore, Title 42 U.S.C § 1983 is a deprivation of rights.

The attached document also shows what is and isn’t a legitimate legislative or judicial activity based on the enumerated grants of power as it pertains to qualified immunity (not discussed in the attached document). A legitimate function/act of government is also permitted or restricted by the grants of enumerated power. All grants and limits of power are either prohibited or authorized by three simple words “shall” and “shall not “. [The enumerated powers of government are defined and listed/limited [Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137, 176 (1803) (Marshall, C. J.)].

“Shall" or “must" means an action, procedure, or duty is mandatory and/or required.
“Shall not" or “must not" means an action, or procedure is prohibited and/or an obligation not to act and/or to refrain from acting is duly imposed (if done; is not a legitimate act of government).
If a legislative and/or judicial body does what is prohibited, then it is not a legitimate legislative or judicial act. Likewise, if the bodies are derelict the same applies (a violation of oaths).

The attached document also shows the difference between procedural due process laws and substantive due process laws. Drawing inference to the Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. 36 (1872) the courts/constitution identifies two forms of citizenship in the United States: federal and state. Federal citizens are entitled to substantive Due Process laws and rights according to its constitutional guarantee. State citizens, according to the slaughterhouse cases, pertains to the children and/or the creations of a state such as corporations. This form of citizenship is governed by procedural due process laws. However, it’s not uncommon for local governments to impose procedural due process laws on federal citizens, especially in courtrooms.

[Satisfying legislative procedure alone is not enough to satisfy Due Process (Chicago, B. & Q.R. Co v Chicago 166 US 226,237 (1897) Justice Harlan].

Unfortunately, substantive Due Process rights must be hard fought. This is no easy trick because if the courts were actually forced to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt them the system would collapse under the volume of its own weight (case logs).

The document also shows relevant information about the Ninth and Tenth Amendments. Every American should know as much as possible about the Ninth Amendment because it’s singularly the most powerful grant in the Bill of Rights.

The impact of federal abortion protections on state law.

Abortion is a First Amendment right pursuant of religious Exercise of the U.S. Constitution. The federal Frist Amendment rights are upheld, adopted, and absorbed within the State Constitutions of all 50-states. This means, state anti-abortion laws are contrary to the state.

See Halakha and the Kentucky abortion lawsuit involving three Jewish women (Jessica Kalb, Lisa Sobel, and Sarah Baron), filed in the Jefferson Circuit Court, Louisville, KY. Court judge, Mitch Perry, ruled (7/ 22) that there is "a substantial likelihood" that Kentucky's new abortion laws violate "the rights to privacy and self-determination" protected by Kentucky's constitution. Also see Halakha (Halakhah; the Way; the totality of laws and ordinances evolved since biblical times that regulate religious observances and daily life) according to the Bible the way or the path is the true meaning of biblical faith (Is 35:8, John 14:4 & 6,) before faith was interpreted as belief/pistis (Strong’s number G4102) by non-Jewish persons/Greek philosophers. Not all Christians subscribe to theology. Theology is a religious theory about God which is no different than the theory of Atlantis and/or the theory of evolution. Resultantly, “Jews do not consider life to begin at conception; this religious belief is forced on them by the government,” and/or state church. “Kentucky’s laws are Christian in origin and design and impugn the faith of Jewish Kentuckians.” According to the Midrash Bereishit Rabbah 34:10, life begins "from the moment the fetus emerges from the womb" (breathes air and becomes a living soul; Genesis 2:7).

Nonparental miscarriages or abortions.

The religious rights to an abortion and/or abortifacients are only retained by the parents of an unborn child. Any non-parental persons, groups, governments, agencies, corporations, organizations, and/or institutions, causing a woman’s fruit to depart from her (abort/miscarry) shall surely be punished by the punishment laid upon the person, group, government, agency, corporation, organization, and/or institution by the woman’s husband according to Exodus 21:22 (KJV & NLT). If the woman is unmarried, then the punishment shall be established by the father of the child and/or the father of the woman, and/or by the woman’s siblings and/or by her father’s siblings and/or closest kinsperson in succession to the woman according to Numbers 27:8-11 (KJV). In this regard, First Amendment protections may charge any government agency, official and/or state actor with First Amendment violations and deprivations of rights, subject to redress of grievances. Uniquely, the punishment (compensation), penalty and/or redress attached to the unprohibited exercise removes any preestablished limits on torts in compliance to the exercise identified in Exodus 21:22 (KJV & NLT), as determined by a judge/court. The demand for redress, remedy, and/or liability is not only justified under both civil and criminal procedures, statutes, codes, and laws, but now the First Amendment; this negatively impacts the appeals process; particularly for private actors. The First Amendment has never been viewed in such a way before, but the language is clear, unprohibited exercise is to be upheld by the laws of the land. Even though the paradigm is consistent with judicial proceedings it represents an odd type of Sharia Law for Christians in America. It removes the protections of those causing an unnatural miscarriage and//or nonparental abortion.

Keywords

what is an abortion, abortifacients, what are abortifacients, legal abortions, abortion and religious freedom, abortions are constitutional, abortion in the US Constitution, abortion is a first amendment, first amendment right to an abortion, constitutional right to abortion, abortion is a constitutional right, abortion and the law, lawful abortions, religious abortions, Christian abortion, facts about abortion, facts on abortion, abortion facts, price of an abortion, cost of an abortion, abortion rates in America, abortion statistics in US, statistics on abortion, moral issue of abortion, religious view of abortion, religious view of abortion, catholic view of abortion, catholics and abortion, unborn human life, catholics and abortion, pope and abortion, teaching on abortion, teaching about abortion, bible condone abortion, does the bible abortion, does the bible prescribe abortion, bible permit abortion, abortion is a sin, is abortion a sin, abortion is wrong, abortion is morally wrong, is abortion ok, is abortion okay, is abortion in the bible, is abortion condoned by scripture, is abortion in scripture, did God cause an abortion, what the bible says about abortion, religious abortion lawsuits, religious leaders and abortion, faith leaders and abortion, religious freedom arguments, religion and abortion, when does life begin, when life begins, religious views on abortion, about abortion laws, what is an abortion, what is abortion, abortion bans, myths about abortion, science of abortion, science and abortion, anti-abortion arguments, science and abortion rights, scientist and abortions, scientists against abortions, abortion clinic, reproductive rights, threat to reproductive rights, donate abortion clinic, crowdfunds abortion clinic, morality of abortions, social and moral issues abortion, Christianity and abortion, catholic and abortion, Catholicism and abortion, republicans and abortion, GOP against abortions, republicans against abortion, conservatives against abortion, conservative view of abortion, abortions bills, pro-life abortion, pro-choice abortion. planned parenthood abortion, reproductive rights abortion, abortion and religious freedom, abortion and contraceptives, abortion and safe sex, abortion and adoption, the morning after abortion

Legal arguments abortion, abortion lawsuits, stay on abortion law, help get an abortion, safe abortions, abortion advice, abortion procedure, abortions drug, abortion pill, abortion herb. Induce an abortion, supreme court and abortion, SCOTUS and abortion, abortion Roe v Wade, Roe v. Wade, Roe vs Wade, privacy abortion, Dobbs decision and abortion, jail and abortion, abortion arrest, abortion doctor, faith leaders and abortion, preacher and abortion, priest and abortion, abort fetus, woman’s womb, thigh to rot, pregnant and abortion.

Abortion laws by state, abortion rights, abortion is a right, right to abortion, abortion is a legal right, abortion is a legal exercise, religious abortion rights, religious leaders sue, abortion news, abortion around the world, U.S. abortion laws, understanding abortion laws, cost of abortion, price of abortion, abortion bans, military abortion bans, military abortions, abortion laws, state abortion law, termination of pregnancy, terminating a pregnancy, removal of fetus, removal of embryo, abortion information, medical abortion, medical abortion procedure, abortion procedures, killing a baby, killing babies, abortion kills babies, baby killer, abortion clinic, abortion doctor, abortion appointment, abortion care specialist, abortion care specialists, pro-life, pro-life arguments, stacking the courts, stacking the supreme court,

Alabama abortion laws, Arkansas abortion laws, Idaho abortion laws, Kentucky abortion laws, Louisiana abortion laws, Mississippi abortion laws, Missouri abortion laws, Oklahoma abortion laws, South Dakota abortion laws, Tennessee abortion laws, Texas abortion laws,

where to get abortion, illegal abortions, abortion is illegal, abortions are illegal, abortion is murder, religious abortions, constitutional right to abortion, abortion rights, what to know about abortion, biblical abortion, what does the bible say about abortion, abortion in the bible, abortion in scripture, abortion is not a sin, state-church, Justice Alito and abortion, Justice Alito and Dobb’s, deprivation of rights, Title 42 U.S.C § 1983"

Subscribe Now (inactive)

Mon	09:00 am – 05:00 pm
Tue	09:00 am – 05:00 pm
Wed	09:00 am – 05:00 pm
Thu	09:00 am – 05:00 pm
Fri	09:00 am – 05:00 pm
Sat	Closed
Sun	Closed

Religious Abortion Rights

Abortion is a religious exercise pursuant of the First Amendment

Abortion is a religious exercise pursuant of the First Amendment

Important information about the legal status of abortions and abortion law.

Contact Us

Drop us a line!

Religious Abortion Rights

Hours

Abortion is a religious exercise pursuant of the First Amendment

Abortion is a religious exercise pursuant of the First Amendment

Important information about the legal status of abortions and abortion law.

Contact Us

Drop us a line!

Religious Abortion Rights

Hours

This website uses cookies.